|
1
|
- Or
- Teaching the Joy of Citation
|
|
2
|
- This workshop aims to explore issues surrounding academic honesty. More specifically, in it we will seek
- to understand the complexities of the subject
- to examine students’ perspectives
- to consider reactions or penalties
- to review Hawkeye Community College’s policy
- to consider teaching practices that may deter academic dishonesty
|
|
3
|
- Plagiarism
- Copyright Infringement
- Originality
- Imitation
- Patchwriting
- Common Knowledge
- Copyleft
- Appropriation
- Open Source
- Open Content
- Academic Dishonesty
- Citation
- Attribution
- Allusion
- Common Content
|
|
4
|
- The continuum of iniquity
- Donald McCabe and the Center for Academic Integrity (CAI)
- Honor codes
- The trouble with talking about morality
|
|
5
|
- They may be affected by popular culture’s nonchalance toward borrowing
text, art, music.
- They may never have been taught.
- They may have gotten away with not citing and so they don’t understand
the importance.
- They may come from a culture that has different attitudes toward using
others’ words.
- They may be more focused on earning the credential than on learning
through doing.
|
|
6
|
- Differences between disciplines
- Different assumptions than in other contexts
- Complexities of citing from different types of sources
- Focusing on the need to document where you learned things
|
|
7
|
- Code -- Hawkeye Community College Policy
- Consistency of punishments
- Publishing of punishments
- Community focus on ethical behavior
|
|
8
|
- Discuss, discuss, discuss
- Emphasize the responsibility of a member of the academic community
- Put on your syllabus information about the importance of proper
attribution
- Review that information with the class
- Talk about citation (your own practice and citation as it occurs in
readings)
- Talk about plagiarism, look at paper mills, discuss plagiarism-checking
sites
|
|
9
|
- Make assignments that are individualized, that relate to the course work
specifically
- Change your topics from time to time
- Teach students how to cite (exercises, anatomy of a citation, paraphrase
exercises)
- Require evidence of the research and writing process
- Make assignments where students use research in different ways: separate
the research from the paper to help them learn (see WPA Statement on
Best Practices)
|
|
10
|
- Source: Peggy Bates and Margaret Fain in Kimbel Library Presentations
(Coastal Carolina University)
- Cheating 101: Detecting Plagiarized Papers
- 1. Writing style, language, vocabulary, tone, grammar, etc. is above or
below what the student usually produces. It doesn't sound like the
student.
- 2. Spelling or idioms used are not found in the students' native
language
|
|
11
|
- 3. Sections or sentences do not relate to the overall content of the
paper. Students may "personalize" a paper by adding a
paragraph that ties the paper to the class assignment
- 4. Pronouns do not agree with the gender of the writer.
- 5. Look for strange text at the top or bottom of printed pages.
|
|
12
|
- 6. Look for gray letters in the text, often an indication that the page
was downloaded from the web, since color letters on a screen show up
gray in a printout.
- 7. Essays are printed out from the student's web browser.
- 8. Web addresses left at the top or bottom of the page. Many free essays
have a tag line at the end of the essay that students often miss.
|
|
13
|
- 9. Strange or poor layout. Papers that have been downloaded and
re-printed often have page numbers, headings, or spacing that just don't
look right.
- 10. References to graphs, charts, or accompanying material that isn't
there.
- 11. References to professors, classes, or class numbers that are not
taught at Coastal Carolina University.
- 12. Quotes in the paper do not have citations.
|
|
14
|
- 13. Citations are to materials not owned by Kimbel Library or are all
from another country.
- 14. Citations in the bibliography or works cited can not be verified.
- 15. Citations in the paper are not included in the works cited.
- 16. Web sites listed in citations are inactive.
- 17. All citations are to
materials that are older than five years.
|
|
15
|
- 18. References are made to historical persons or events in the current
sense.
- 19. Students can not identify citations or provide copies of the cited
material.
- 20. Students can not summarize the main points of the paper or answer
questions about specific sections of the paper.
- 21. When provided with a page from their paper that has words or
passages removed, students can not fill in the blanks with the missing
words or with reasonable synonyms.
|
|
16
|
- Robert Harris, The Plagiarism Handbook: Strategies for Preventing,
Detecting, and Dealing with Plagiarism. Los Angeles, Pyrczak: 2001.
- Graff, Gerald and Cathy Birkenstein.
They Say/ I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York, W.W. Norton: 2006.
- Lipson, Charles. Doing Honest
Work in College: How to Prepare Citations, Avoid Plagiarism, and Achieve
Real Academic Success. Chicago, U
Chicago P: 2004.
|
|
17
|
- WPA statement on plagiarism. http://www.wpacouncil.org/node/9
- Purdue Owl: Avoiding Plagiarism. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/589/01/
- Grinnell College Writing Lab website: http://www.grinnell.edu/academic/writinglab/
|
|
18
|
- Robert Harris’ Virtual Salt [a very practical resource for teachers]
- http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm
- University of San Diego’s Ethics Updates [links to lots of sources, both
popular and scholarly]
- http://ethics.sandiego.edu/Resources/AcademicIntegrity/Index.asp
|
|
19
|
- University of Maryland’s Office of Information Technology Net Ethics
[example of a college’s attempts to communicate about honesty in
relation to IT]
- http://www.nethics.umd.edu/
- Ronald B. Standler’s Plagiarism in Colleges in the US [an oft-cited
legal study of the issue]
- http://www.rbs2.com/plag.htm
- Plagiary [a new scholarly journal]
- http://www.plagiary.org/
|