Yes. In a budget of roughly $61 million, we will have approximately $2.5 million of additional revenue in next year's budget. Almost $1.4 million of this increased revenue will be used to support the 5.25% increase in the faculty salary/benefits pool and a 4.25% increase in the staff salary/benefits pool. (See Questions #18 and #19 for more on salaries and benefits.) That leaves about $1.1 million for all other budget functions. The non-salary instructional budget will increase by $348,000, which includes substantial increased support for student-faculty research.

The remaining additional revenue (about $752,000) will be used in large part to fund initiatives associated with our heightened fund raising needs and the facility cost increases related to facilities such as the new Welcome Center. We will also use this additional revenue to fund: 1) additional Diversity initiatives; 2) Improvements to our College publications; 3) Library database enhancements; 4) The Alumni Scholars Program; 5) Several ITS/Academic Computing initiatives; 6) Alternative Break for students; and 7) Food cost increases.

This, of course, is after we take out scholarships and grants awarded by Grinnell College. That is, we are not treating these scholarships and grants as an expense.

The answer to this question depends largely on how one presents the budget. In any presentation, however, two generalizations can be made about our revenues and expenditures. Our largest revenue sources are the endowment contribution and "net" tuition and fees. Our largest expenditures cover the costs associated with "Instruction." Classified in another way, our largest expenditures cover the cost of all salaries/ benefits and maintaining our campus (our physical plant).

At Grinnell, we present our budget in a manner that is consistent with our peers. This also helps to ensure that our budget is accurately and fairly presented. In reporting our budget, we do not show directly Grinnell College-awarded scholarships and grants, which is obviously a very large "expense" item in our budget. This is because, consistent with the methodology used by our peers, we "net" our tuition and mandatory fee income. That is, we show the tuition and mandatory fees as "paid" and then deduct from that figure the amount of any Grinnell College-awarded scholarships and grants. Thus, as set out in the pie chart below, tuition and fees and Grinnell College-awarded scholarships and grants are reported as one figure in our budget: "net tuition and fees." This is done because, for accounting purposes, an item of tuition or any other fee that is reduced by a scholarship or grant award is not really "paid" and probably should not be shown as a revenue item. At the same time, scholarships and grants are a significant allocation of the College's resources.

Conversely, when we present our budget, we show almost all other income items on a "gross" basis. For instance, we show our Auxiliary Enterprises income, which includes items such as room, board, and bookstore payments as revenue. Were we to "net" our Auxiliary Enterprises revenue with the direct costs associated with running these enterprises, we would only show a modest amount of income. Here is what our revenues look like as we report them.

  FY 2003 Budget (Next Year)
Revenues
 
 
Gifts & Grants# $4.8M 7.9%  
Net Tuition & Fees $17.2M
28.2%
Gross Auxiliary Enterprises* $8.7M
14.2%
#Gifts & Grants $4.8M 7.9%
tuition
Other $650K 1%
Endowment Contribution
$29.7M 48.6%
 
*such as Dining, Phone Service and the Bookstore
#includes Government Grants, Contracts, Private Gifts and Grants  
Based on the FY 2003 Budget approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2002
   
  Tuition & Fees  
 
  Net Tuition & Fees
$17.2M
tuition Grinnell College-Awarded
Scholarships and Grants
$15.6M
 
Net Tuition & Fees (17.2M) = Gross Tuition & Fees ($32.8M) minus Grinnell College Scholarships & Grants awarded ($15.6M)
Tuition Discount Rate (48%) = Grinnell College-awarded Scholarships & Grants ($15.6M) divided by Gross Tuition & Fees ($32.8M)
The whole pie = Gross Tuition & Fees ($32.8M)

Thus, to specifically answer the question on the expenditure-side, we could do so in two ways.

1) Under our reporting methodology, on the expenditure side, we talk in terms of functional categories such as "Instruction," Student Services," "Institutional Support," and "Auxiliary Enterprises." Here is what next year's expenditures, including our largest ones, look like by functional classification:

  FY 2003 Budget (Next Year)
Expenditures by Functional Classification
 
 
 
Academic Support
$7.9M 13%
Student Services
$7.9M 13%
 
Instruction $19.6M 33%
tuition
Institutional support
$9.8M 16%
Operation & Maint. of Plant
$4.9M 8%
 
Bldg. Maint &
Equip Fund
$1.5M 2%
Debt service
$1.2M 2%
Auxiliary enterprises
$8.2M 13%
 
 
Based on the FY 2003 Budget approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2002

2) We could also think about our expenditures within a "natural" classification. Using this classification, for example, we could organize our expenditures by such categories as "salaries /benefits" and "maintaining our campus" (our physical plant), which are our two largest expenditures, rather than by the function classifications listed above. Here is what next year's expenditures look like by one natural classification:

FY 2003 Budget (Next Year)
Expenditures by Natural Classification
 
  Maintaining our Campus* $6.7M 11%  
Everything Else# $18.7M
31%
tuition Salaries and Benefits $35.6M
58%
 
*Maintaining our Campus - Includes non-salary operation costs of our Physical Plant, Debt Service and the Building Maintenance and Equipment Fund (for facilities)
#Everything Else - includes items such as faculty and student programs, faculty development, travel, computers, food, and library materials  
Based on the FY 2003 Budget approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2002

No. However, we supported the College's commitment to maintain need-blind admissions and to meet 100% of demonstrated need. The Committee also placed a high priority on competitive faculty/staff salaries and maintaining our low student-faculty ratio.

The fiscal year, corresponding closely to the academic year, runs from July 1 through June 30. For example, FY 2003 starts on July 1, 2002 and ends on June 30, 2003.

We have assumed an additional 10 students next year. This reflects what we have found to be a fairly long-term steady trend of small annual increases, shown below. This assumption allows us to budget more realistically.

Average Fulltime Enrollment

Full time enrollment

You should take your idea to the person who submits your budget. If that person supports your idea as a priority within those areas that he/she oversees, he/she can submit your proposal and make a case for it as an institutional priority worthy of funding. As done this year, the Budget Steering Committee will consider your proposal in relation to all other requests. For example, the library and the Instructional Support Committee proposed JSTOR in next year's budget. This proposal was supported by Jim Swartz, Dean of the College, who recommended to the Budget Steering Committee that JSTOR be funded. Ultimately, the Budget Steering Committee recommended to the President that JSTOR be funded.

The success of Grinnell's endowment growth, shown below, reflects the College's long-term investment success. The 4.5% policy, which provides that we may use up to 4.5% of the twelve-quarter rolling (i.e., moving) average of the endowment's value (but no more), is a limit. Most colleges have a similar policy, which is financially prudent. This policy takes into account the College's changing needs and variations in the health of the economy.

Because of the increasing nominal value of the endowment in recent years, the College has used less than this policy permits for operations. Therefore, somewhat less than 4.5% of the endowment's twelve-quarter rolling average actually has gone into the base budget each year.

In 1998, the Trustees created the Fund for Excellence with the available revenue beyond what was used for the base budget. Now this remainder is placed in the Capital Reserve Fund.

Year-end endowment market value:

From the Grinnell College Fact Book, 2000-01 (page 23)

The Trustees created the Capital Reserve Fund last year. It operates outside of the base budget and is controlled by the Trustees for large capital expenditures such as building construction and renovation. The Capital Reserve Fund is also useful because it "cushions" the base budget from hard times.

The proportion of the budget supported by the endowment is already unusually high at Grinnell compared to our peers. The endowment contribution to the base budget represents 48.6% of the total available revenue in next year's budget. In the event of a sustained downturn in the stock market, this revenue source will decline. If that decline is accompanied by a decline in gifts and grants, the College will find itself with difficult choices between sharp net tuition increases and equally dramatic program cuts. Because increased dependence on the endowment risks the long-term health and stability of the institution, it is wise to seek balance among the "three legs of the stool": tuition revenues, gifts/grants, and the contribution from the endowment. The endowment itself needs to continue to grow (both in nominal and real dollars), not just remain stable, since the steep rise of educational costs would make it impossible to support the College in the same fashion if it didn't grow. Thus, the Board of Trustees charged the President to develop a strategy to reduce this dependence on the endowment and create a more balanced revenue stream.

The Budget Steering Committee recommended investing in initiatives associated with our heightened fund raising needs. The Office of Alumni Relations and Development is working hard to strengthen the Annual Fund, to raise funds for our highest priorities, and to maintain a healthy and sustainable alumni relations/development operation. The College is allocating more money to this effort at this time, because increasing this revenue source is fundamental to the long-term financial well-being of the College. Thanks to the efforts of the Alumni Relations and Development team, we project a 10% increase this year in unrestricted private gifts and grants over last year, all of which will go, if achieved, directly into the base budget and that helps all of us. Here is more information about alumni giving:

Alumni giving:

Giving participation (percent of total dollar value of outright gifts)